Army chief Maj. Gen. John Boswell said the views expressed in the essay are not endorsed by the military.
The army chief will meet with defense force personnel after internal fury over the army’s publication of an essay claiming diversity was “corrosive to society”.
The essay, titled Can the military afford to wake up, make some benign social progress or threaten national security, won an army writing competition in the “private writing category”.
It was posted on an army website on July 1, before being withdrawn after a backlash from the ranks of the Defense Forces.
Women and rainbow members of the Defense Forces were among those who expressed their anger at the choice of the winner, calling the Defense Forces “hypocrites” for praising Operation Respect and its plans to win. army gender neutral while amplifying harmful opposing views.
* Army awards anti-diversity trial award, then removes it after backlash
* Half of women interviewed for an army study say they have been sexually assaulted
* The Defense Force creates more gender neutral job titles
Army chief Maj. Gen. John Boswell issued a “wholehearted apology” for the essay’s publication on Wednesday, saying the military did not support its content. He had named it the winner because it was the best-written entry of two in that category, he said, but that decision was a mistake.
“I will always listen to the opinions of others, especially those of our soldiers. And I think it’s important that we seek to understand where other points of view exist, ”he wrote, in a post at the link where the post was deleted.
“In this particular case, however, it was made clear to me that the publication of this essay was seen as undermining both the inclusive culture we seek and the work that is being done at all levels to effect that change – a work which is incredibly important, not just to me, but to our organization.
Boswell had planned to deal with a number of staff on Wednesday who wanted to voice concerns about the trial’s publication, with another meeting on Monday.
The incident comes as the military is concerned about the presence of personnel with extremist views.
The essay, written by an author identified only as “N Dell,” argues that the military should try to become more exclusive rather than more diverse.
Dell writes that he knows there could be a reaction “to authors of similar documents in the current socio-political climate”, but invokes an army slogan containing the words “courage and integrity” to do so.
“I will argue that the New Zealand military cannot reconcile a more diverse and inclusive workforce with the maintenance of a warrior ethic and culture of warfare, or at least it should not try. “, he wrote.
“In addition, it should redirect as little energy as possible towards creating a culture that is more ‘inclusive’ of how this type of language is understood in today’s politically charged language.
“On the contrary, I will argue that, if anything, the military should instead strive to become more exclusive.”
Efforts to make the military more diverse and inclusive have come at the expense of combat readiness, and the military should stick to “fighting real wars,” he said.
“Every man-hour spent on ‘cultural awareness training’ or similar programs is a man-hour that is not spent on combat training or monitoring our enemies.”
He also claims that Maori are overrepresented in the military, which he argues, citing a Google search, and opposes attempts to “engineer” diversity.
“The trend over the past five to six years to focus more and more on race, gender and sexual orientation looks like a throwback to a pre-social era where these arbitrary characteristics of a person received a lot. more weight than they deserve. “
Former Army officer Dr Ellen Nelson, who wrote her doctorate on inclusion and diversity in the military, said there was an overwhelming amount of research showing the benefits of diversity for the culture and performance of the army.
Another essay, which won the NCO category, argued that increasing diversity and inclusion is in the spirit of upholding the war ethic and culture of strength.
The article, by “Ms E Campbell”, cites various sources, including a book by retired US General Stanley McChrystal. “The modern New Zealand soldier is diverse and inclusive, and a stronger warrior for him.”